Comments on: Portpeek https://www.mpagano.com/blog My Digital Contribution Sat, 22 Aug 2020 15:42:32 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.3.2 By: NightDragon https://www.mpagano.com/blog/?page_id=3&cpage=1#comment-198018 Fri, 07 Jun 2019 01:49:45 +0000 http://www.mpagano.com/blog/?page_id=3#comment-198018 Hi!

I would love to see an option to be asked for each line to be removed or being kept.

That way i can decide line per line about it. (e.g. checking the validity of some packages later… or similar).

Best regards,

NightDragon

]]>
By: Miles https://www.mpagano.com/blog/?page_id=3&cpage=1#comment-197148 Tue, 26 Mar 2019 14:03:30 +0000 http://www.mpagano.com/blog/?page_id=3#comment-197148 Currently, if portpeek encounters a symlink to a writeable file in any of its target directories, it clobbers it and replaces it with a real file. Can this behavior be altered, or certain files not be processed at all? I’m attempting to use shared config files to centrally manage packages on many Gentoo boxes.

]]>
By: BattleCoder https://www.mpagano.com/blog/?page_id=3&cpage=1#comment-135336 Fri, 31 Oct 2014 18:16:58 +0000 http://www.mpagano.com/blog/?page_id=3#comment-135336 Hi.

Python-3.4 is unmasked in stable portage branch.
Could you please add USE=”python3_4″ to this package?

Thank you.

]]>
By: admin https://www.mpagano.com/blog/?page_id=3&cpage=1#comment-126916 Sat, 04 Oct 2014 00:32:04 +0000 http://www.mpagano.com/blog/?page_id=3#comment-126916 This should be fixed in 2.1.16. Please let me know if you still have issues.

]]>
By: sargas https://www.mpagano.com/blog/?page_id=3&cpage=1#comment-125456 Sat, 27 Sep 2014 15:36:28 +0000 http://www.mpagano.com/blog/?page_id=3#comment-125456 Not sure if this is still checked/maintained, but I wanted to point out an issue: SLOT-ed package atoms break things. For instance, ‘>=kde-base/lokalize-4.13.3:4’ in my one of my package.use files gives:

Traceback (most recent call last):
File “/usr/lib/python-exec/python2.7/portpeek”, line 1468, in
get_recursive_info(USER_CONFIG_PATH + “/package.use”)
File “/usr/lib/python-exec/python2.7/portpeek”, line 418, in get_recursive_info
get_recursive_info(filename+os.path.sep+file_name)
File “/usr/lib/python-exec/python2.7/portpeek”, line 420, in get_recursive_info
get_info(filename)
File “/usr/lib/python-exec/python2.7/portpeek”, line 446, in get_info
diffs_found = parse_package_use(line,filename)
File “/usr/lib/python-exec/python2.7/portpeek”, line 538, in parse_package_use
if (pkgcmp(pkgsplit(check_pkg),pkgsplit(str(current_package.cpv))) == 0) or (pkgcmp(pkgsplit(check_pkg),pkgsplit(str(current_package.cpv))) == 2):
File “/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/portage/versions.py”, line 292, in pkgcmp
if pkg1[0] != pkg2[0]:
TypeError: ‘NoneType’ object has no attribute ‘__getitem__’

]]>
By: BattleCoder https://www.mpagano.com/blog/?page_id=3&cpage=1#comment-11548 Sun, 21 Oct 2012 11:02:02 +0000 http://www.mpagano.com/blog/?page_id=3#comment-11548 Hi!.

I am using portpeek version 2.0.25, and I am getting the following error (in the bottom of full portpeek log)

Traceback (most recent call last):
File “/usr/bin/portpeek”, line 1370, in
clean_useflagsFile(USER_CONFIG_PATH + “/package.use”)
File “/usr/bin/portpeek”, line 1020, in clean_useflagsFile
cleanuseflagsFile(filename+os.path.sep+file_name)
NameError: global name ‘cleanuseflagsFile’ is not defined

I think it is kind of erratum in the script. Please, fix it.

]]>
By: admin https://www.mpagano.com/blog/?page_id=3&cpage=1#comment-368 Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:59:48 +0000 http://www.mpagano.com/blog/?page_id=3#comment-368 @Luis, dependencies should all be sorted out now.

]]>
By: Luís Ferreira https://www.mpagano.com/blog/?page_id=3&cpage=1#comment-366 Fri, 26 Nov 2010 23:10:32 +0000 http://www.mpagano.com/blog/?page_id=3#comment-366 I’ve portage-2.1.9.24 installed. Portpeek requires portage-2.1.8.3.

]]>
By: Luís Ferreira https://www.mpagano.com/blog/?page_id=3&cpage=1#comment-365 Fri, 26 Nov 2010 23:07:32 +0000 http://www.mpagano.com/blog/?page_id=3#comment-365 emerge -av portpeek

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies… done!
[ebuild UD] sys-apps/portage-2.1.8.3 [2.1.9.24] USE=”-build -doc -epydoc -python3 (-selinux) (-ipc%*)” LINGUAS=”-pl” 0 kB
[ebuild N ] app-portage/portpeek-1.5.8.4 0 kB

Total: 2 packages (1 downgrade, 1 new), Size of downloads: 0 kB

Would you like to merge these packages? [Yes/No] n

Quitting.

]]>
By: Stephan https://www.mpagano.com/blog/?page_id=3&cpage=1#comment-237 Thu, 06 May 2010 15:25:38 +0000 http://www.mpagano.com/blog/?page_id=3#comment-237 @Dave
If I remember correctly, Paludis includes a utility script functionally equivalent to portpeek… I just can’t remember what it’s called. (I know it’s not reconcilio though. That’s the revdep-rebuild equivalent)

]]>