Comments on: Portpeek http://www.mpagano.com/blog My Digital Contribution Sun, 29 Aug 2010 12:23:24 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Stephan http://www.mpagano.com/blog/?page_id=3&cpage=1#comment-237 Stephan Thu, 06 May 2010 15:25:38 +0000 http://www.mpagano.com/blog/?page_id=3#comment-237 @Dave If I remember correctly, Paludis includes a utility script functionally equivalent to portpeek... I just can't remember what it's called. (I know it's not reconcilio though. That's the revdep-rebuild equivalent) @Dave
If I remember correctly, Paludis includes a utility script functionally equivalent to portpeek… I just can’t remember what it’s called. (I know it’s not reconcilio though. That’s the revdep-rebuild equivalent)

]]> By: Marco http://www.mpagano.com/blog/?page_id=3&cpage=1#comment-217 Marco Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:20:28 +0000 http://www.mpagano.com/blog/?page_id=3#comment-217 Nice script. I found it by browsing the app-portage category, but whished such a tool existed for a few months. Thank you! Nice script. I found it by browsing the app-portage category, but whished such a tool existed for a few months. Thank you!

]]> By: Sol http://www.mpagano.com/blog/?page_id=3&cpage=1#comment-212 Sol Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:47:53 +0000 http://www.mpagano.com/blog/?page_id=3#comment-212 It looks like more recent versions of portage have removed the leading slash from USER_CONFIG_PATH. This causes portpeek to fail unless I add the slash manually. I currently have the following version installed: [I] sys-apps/portage Available versions: 2.1.4.5 2.1.6.7 2.1.6.13 ~2.1.7 (~)2.1.7.1 [M]~2.2_rc33 [M]~2.2_rc41 [M]~2.2_rc42 [M]~2.2_rc44 [M]~2.2_rc45 [M]~2.2_rc46 {build doc epydoc linguas_pl python3 selinux} Installed versions: 2.1.7.1(09:51:06 10/12/09)(python3 -build -doc -epydoc -linguas_pl -selinux) Homepage: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/portage/index.xml Description: Portage is the package management and distribution system for Gentoo It looks like more recent versions of portage have removed the leading slash from USER_CONFIG_PATH. This causes portpeek to fail unless I add the slash manually. I currently have the following version installed:

[I] sys-apps/portage
Available versions: 2.1.4.5 2.1.6.7 2.1.6.13 ~2.1.7 (~)2.1.7.1 [M]~2.2_rc33 [M]~2.2_rc41 [M]~2.2_rc42 [M]~2.2_rc44 [M]~2.2_rc45 [M]~2.2_rc46 {build doc epydoc linguas_pl python3 selinux}
Installed versions: 2.1.7.1(09:51:06 10/12/09)(python3 -build -doc -epydoc -linguas_pl -selinux)
Homepage: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/portage/index.xml
Description: Portage is the package management and distribution system for Gentoo

]]> By: admin http://www.mpagano.com/blog/?page_id=3&cpage=1#comment-209 admin Mon, 21 Sep 2009 23:11:32 +0000 http://www.mpagano.com/blog/?page_id=3#comment-209 @Dave I'm sorry. I don't use paludis. @Dave

I’m sorry. I don’t use paludis.

]]> By: Dave http://www.mpagano.com/blog/?page_id=3&cpage=1#comment-208 Dave Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:16:29 +0000 http://www.mpagano.com/blog/?page_id=3#comment-208 I was wondering if you've had any progress with paludis support? I could sent you my sample files if you like. I was wondering if you’ve had any progress with paludis support? I could sent you my sample files if you like.

]]> By: McDuck http://www.mpagano.com/blog/?page_id=3&cpage=1#comment-201 McDuck Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:17:52 +0000 http://www.mpagano.com/blog/?page_id=3#comment-201 Hi I am missing some functionality. I am using directories which portpeek does not read. It would be a nice feature. # pwd && ls -lR /etc/portage .: total 0 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 72 Jul 22 08:24 package.keywords drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 104 Aug 15 14:43 package.use ./package.keywords: total 4 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 47 Jul 22 08:39 vlc ./package.use: total 8 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 59 Jul 28 20:50 mediatomb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 178 Jul 22 09:57 vlc Hi
I am missing some functionality. I am using directories which portpeek does not read. It would be a nice feature.

# pwd && ls -lR
/etc/portage
.:
total 0
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 72 Jul 22 08:24 package.keywords
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 104 Aug 15 14:43 package.use

./package.keywords:
total 4
-rw-r–r– 1 root root 47 Jul 22 08:39 vlc

./package.use:
total 8
-rw-r–r– 1 root root 59 Jul 28 20:50 mediatomb
-rw-r–r– 1 root root 178 Jul 22 09:57 vlc

]]> By: admin http://www.mpagano.com/blog/?page_id=3&cpage=1#comment-193 admin Sun, 14 Jun 2009 00:00:18 +0000 http://www.mpagano.com/blog/?page_id=3#comment-193 @Stefano Thanks for the nice comments. Color suppression added to portpeek-1.8.1 @Stefano

Thanks for the nice comments.
Color suppression added to portpeek-1.8.1

]]> By: Stefano http://www.mpagano.com/blog/?page_id=3&cpage=1#comment-192 Stefano Sat, 13 Jun 2009 12:17:07 +0000 http://www.mpagano.com/blog/?page_id=3#comment-192 Hi Mike, portpeek is really very useful... Nice work! I hope to see the latest version in stable as soon as possible. Just a little request: could you add back the no-color option? I use portpeek in a cron script, and those ANSI codes reduce the readability of the output messages. Thanks, Stefano Hi Mike,

portpeek is really very useful… Nice work! I hope to see the latest version in stable as soon as possible.

Just a little request: could you add back the no-color option? I use portpeek in a cron script, and those ANSI codes reduce the readability of the output messages.

Thanks,

Stefano

]]> By: admin http://www.mpagano.com/blog/?page_id=3&cpage=1#comment-177 admin Thu, 14 May 2009 20:30:47 +0000 http://www.mpagano.com/blog/?page_id=3#comment-177 @Nico Thanks for the kind words. Could you email me your paludis files? I've never seen them before and would like to take a look. mpagano at gentoo.org @Nico

Thanks for the kind words.
Could you email me your paludis files? I’ve never seen them before and would like to take a look.

mpagano at gentoo.org

]]> By: Nico http://www.mpagano.com/blog/?page_id=3&cpage=1#comment-176 Nico Thu, 14 May 2009 18:54:13 +0000 http://www.mpagano.com/blog/?page_id=3#comment-176 portpeek is fantastic! any chance to get it to cooperate with paludis? the files in /etc/paludis look very much like the original portage equivalents, so i guess it wouldn't be terribly complicated to port it, but this is just a wild guess. anyway, that'd be highly appreciated. portpeek is fantastic!

any chance to get it to cooperate with paludis? the files in /etc/paludis look very much like the original portage equivalents, so i guess it wouldn’t be terribly complicated to port it, but this is just a wild guess.

anyway, that’d be highly appreciated.

]]>